Agenda item
RECYCLING IN HACKNEY - PRESENTATION
Minutes:
Ander Zabala, the Recycling
Manager of Hackney Council gave a presentation on recycling in
Hackney borough. A copy of the presentation is interleaved with the
agenda.
In the discussion the following points were made:
·
Hackney Council provides a comprehensive service
borough wide for both street level properties and estates. In 2013,
the Council introduced green sacks to low rise
properties. There was a recognition
that green boxes would not be suitable for over 14,000 properties
without frontages.
·
The Recycling Manager advised the participation rate
of green sacks across street level properties was an average of
84%, whereas participation rate for food waste was 34%.
He stated that it was noticeable that participation rates was
low in deprived estates, which produce high levels of waste but
recycle the least.
·
In response to a question about the vehicles
collecting waste or recycled materials, the Manager informed the
Committee that the decision to move from source separated
collection to a commingle collection (green sack) allowed
environmental waste operations to use older or used waste vehicles
for recycling. These waste vehicles have one compartment. This has
resulted in the extension on the life of the waste vehicles, as the
older ones can be for recycling which is lighter than waste. The
Recycling Manager acknowledged that the use of green sacks rather
than green boxes had resulted in faster collections by the crew and
a reduction in traffic congestion.
·
The Recycling Manager advised that Hackney Council
employed the services of an external consultant to assist in
developing five possible waste restriction collection, modelling
scenarios with the aim of increasing the recycling rate, the
operational resource impact and carbon impact.
·
Projects were undertaken to consider the
participation rate, waste composition and restriction modelling.
The analysis of data obtained from 300 households indicated that
food tonnage remains the largest component by weight in the waste
stream; the weight of recycling material had decreased since 2008
and that contamination was not an issue in dry and food
streams on street level.
·
In light of the low recycling rate in estates or
high rises which account for over 50 % of properties in the borough
a corporate programme was set up in 2014/15 to improve low
performance levels on estates. The Recycling Manager informed
Members that the Estates Recycling Programme involved a range of
interventions, from phase 1 to phase 3. Phase 2 being closing
chutes and building new bin stores.
·
In response to a question on the sustainability of
recycling rates and participation on the Estates, the Recycling
Manager advised that the outcomes from the pilots on the three
estates involving 1000 residents would be reported in the spring of
2018.
·
Members were advised that on the three estates where
the trials are ongoing and the chutes have been removed, a decision was taken that both waste and
recycling bins would be sited next to one another in other to
change the behaviour of the residents. The Manager acknowledged
that since the trial commenced it was noticeable from the available
data, currently for one out of the three estate trials, that
recycling rate had gone up and the amount of waste was
down
·
The meeting was informed
that the budget for the Estates programme is £0.5million per
year, which is mainly to allow closure of the chutes and the
building of new bin stores. The Manager advised that the other two
estates trial tonnages are expected by Q4 of 2017/18. However if the Council were to close all chutes,
then 600 new bin stores would need to be built in the coming
years.
·
In response to questions about fly tipping
especially with large waste such as furniture and large goods in
the public areas, the Recycling Manager informed the Committee that
this was handled by the enforcement team. With regards to the
littering and amenity of bin stores, he advised that cleansing of
such storage areas was managed by the Housing services now that it
had come back in-house.
·
With regards to engaging with supermarket on
recycling, the Recycling Manager advised that this was more of a
central government issue although Hackney Council had worked with
Tesco and Charities on recycling issues. However it was not
regarded as core to their operations.
·
Members were advised that Hackney residents continue
to receive green sacks every 3 months which are delivered by
operatives/crew. Residents had the option of ordering the green
sacks online when their stock of green sacks is depleted. In terms
of community engagement, the recycling team delivers several events
per year, engages with residents via Hackney Today, and they are
now using social media advertising to engage with the younger
generation.
·
With regards to special projects such as the food
waste campaign, the Recycling Manager informed the meeting that
Hackney Council undertook a borough wide outdoor advertising
campaign in 2014/15 which resulted in a 30% increase in tonnage and
the Council was recognised as the 2015 National Recycling Awards
Winners.
·
In 2006 Hackney Council recruited Green Champions to
promote the service to neighbours and record issues for the
recycling team to act upon, however it has not been active for over
7 year. It is difficult to correlate the
existence of green champions with increased recycling rates, but it
can bring other benefits to the recycling team, such as increased
interaction with residents, wider reach of recycling messages, and
on-street recycling monitoring and reporting. Also it was
noticeable that most of the champions had moved onto other green
issues of interest. The Manager advised that lessons learnt from
having champions was that appointment for such roles should be time
specific, for example a green champion network to start and end
within a 12 month period.
·
The meeting was informed that in October 2016
Hackney Council received £638,000 from DCLG to provide
rewards scheme for residents who recycle. The three year programme resulted in 110,000 doors being
knocked with a 35% contact rate and about 28,000 residents signing
up to the programme. Residents were offered local
discounts and cash offers of £40 & £100
vouchers and the option of supporting charities of their
preference.
· In response to concerns about penalising residents for failing to participate when compulsory recycling was brought in 2007, the meeting was advised that this was never applied. In most instances the officers would engage with the residents and sanctions would only have been imposed as a last resource. The Council has been successful in obtaining prosecutions in extreme instances of fly tipping. Members were informed that government legislation makes it more difficult for the Council to penalise residents but in any event Hackney Council prefers education and engagement.
Supporting documents: