Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 4, Town Hall, Upper Street, N1 2UD. View directions
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Caluori, Shaikh and Webbe. |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: None. |
|
Minutes of Previous Meeting PDF 74 KB Decision: Noted. Minutes: That the Minutes of the meeting on 14 June 2018 be confirmed as a correct record and the Chair be authorised to sign them. |
|
The Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman finding of Maladministration PDF 108 KB Additional documents: Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes: Peter Fehler, the
Acting Director of Law and Governance and Monitoring Officer,
introduced the report advising that the Local
Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) had issued and
published a report finding maladministration against the
council. The LGSCO found the council at
fault in three respects following investigation into a complaint
received regarding Children and Employment Services.
2.1. That
the contents of the LGSCO’s report dated 29 May 2018, a copy of
2.2. That
the findings and remedies recommended by the LGSCO have been
2.3. That the actions taken by the council to implement the recommendations made by the LGSCO be noted.
2.4. That
copies of this report have been sent to all members of the council,
be
2.5. That no
further report or action needs to be taken in relation to the
matters
2.6 That a copy of this report and the Executive
minutes will be sent to the LGSCO
Reason for decision – to respond to the report of the LGSCO and ensure that future service delivery will be informed by the learning following assessment of the complaint. Other options considered – none other than as specified in the report. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. |
|
Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes: Councillor Ward thanked the Housing Scrutiny Committee Chair and Committee Members for their hard work and confirmed that housing safety is a top priority. Councillor Ward confirmed that he and the Chair of Housing Scrutiny Committee, Councillor Mick O’Sullivan, had written to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asking for funding for fire safety works.
RESOLVED: That the response to the Housing Scrutiny Committee’s recommendations for fire safety in Council housing, as outlined in section 4 of this report, be agreed.
Reason for decision – to allow the Executive to respond to the recommendations of the Housing Scrutiny committee. Other options considered – none other than as specified in the report. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. |
|
Transforming Shared Digital our shared service with Camden and Haringey PDF 130 KB Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes: Councillor Hull introduced the report and
advised that following consultation and a review of the Shared
Digital Service it was proposed that the three councils move
towards an amended model, detailed in the report and
recommendations. Councillor Hull also
proposed an additional recommendation, detailed below as
recommendation 2.11, which the Executive agreed.
2.1 That having considered the results of the
consultation set out in paragraph 7 and feedback from Trades
Unions, employees and other stakeholders, the the achievements of the shared service (including
c. £2.4m of annual savings in the delivery of commodity
Digital and ICT services, to be shared equally by the three
Councils) and the challenges in achieving strategic alignment with
Camden and Haringey, be noted.
2.2 That the
recommendations set out in the report to the Executive on 4 January
2018 in respect of the creation of a ‘lean’ Joint
Committee model are no longer implemented and that a revised
governance model for Shared Digital be adopted as set out in
paragraph 2.4, specifically that the Shared Digital Joint Committee
cease to exist be agreed and that that Camden host the shared
Digital and ICT functions to be transferred from Islington and
Haringey councils be agreed. That
Islington, Camden and Haringey will have lead officers in place to
oversee their sovereign Digital and ICT services and the Shared
Functions delivered by Camden (including their performance against
service level agreements (‘SLAs’)) be agreed.
2.3
That any decisions in respect of Shared Digital required to be
taken prior to the new arrangements coming into effect on 1 October
2018 (or such later date as may be agreed) will be referred to the
Executive rather than the Joint Committee be noted.
2.4
That, pursuant to regulation 5 of the Local Authorities
(Arrangements for the Discharge of Functions) (England) Regulations
2012 ('the Regulations') to have those parts of the executive
function of Islington's Digital and ICT service and functions
specified in paragraphs [ 4.4 and 5.10] ('the Shared Functions')
delegated to and discharged by the Executive of the London Borough
of Camden in accordance with Camden's constitutional arrangements
for decision making, be agreed.
2.5
That Camden be approved as the host Council in respect of the
Shared Functions and that the resourcing impact of the proposals as
set out in this report, specifically that Islington and Haringey
Digital and ICT employees involved in the delivery of the Shared
Functions will transfer to Camden from 1 October 2018(as the host
authority) under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of
Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) be noted and that as a result
Camden will be responsible for employing staff engaged to deliver
the Shared Functions, be agreed.
2.6
That the dissolution of the Shared Digital Joint Committee from 1
October 2018 with decision-making reverting to existing Islington
arrangements be agreed. That decision-making for Shared Functions
will be in accordance with Camden’s arrangements be
noted. 2.7 That the transfer of services and staff are planned for 1 October 2018 be noted and that, as a ... view the full minutes text for item 534. |
|
Procurement strategy for shared Parking ICT system PDF 132 KB Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes: RESOLVED: 1. That the procurement strategy to call off services for a parking management system following a further competition from the ESPO Framework 509, Lot 3 has already started be noted.
Reason for decision – to increase the savings which can be achieved through jointly procuring. Other options considered – none other than as specified in the report. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. |
|
Procurement Strategy for a single wide area network service PDF 128 KB Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes:
RESOLVED: 1. That authority to the award of contract for the provision of network services by a single supplier be delegated to the Executive Director of Corporate Services, London Borough of Camden on behalf of all three Councils, be agreed.
Reason for decision – to complete the award of the contract in as timely a manner as possible. Other options considered – none other than as specified in the report. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. |
|
Appointment of a Non-Executive Director to Islington Ltd (iCo) PDF 128 KB Decision: AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS Reason for decision – as specified in the report. Other options considered - none. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. Minutes: RESOLVED:
2.2
That, subject to the receipt of satisfactory references, the
appended
Reason for decision – to enable the appointment of a Non-Executive Director for iCo. Other options considered – none, other than as specified in the report. Conflicts of interest/dispensations granted – none. |