Skip to content

Issue - meetings

Camden and Islington ICT Shared Service Programme

Meeting: 24/09/2015 - Executive (Item 188)

188 Camden and Islington ICT Shared Service Programme pdf icon PDF 475 KB

Decision:

AGREED RECOMMENDATIONS:

Reason for decision – as specified in the report.

Other options considered – none, other than as detailed in the report and related papers.

Conflicts of interest / dispensations granted – none.

 

 

Minutes:

RESOLVED:

1.1       That the establishment a shared ICT and Digital service between Camden
            and Islington Councils be agreed.

1.2       That a formal Joint Committee be established with the London Borough of 
            Camden to oversee the shared service, with a longer-term option to move
            towards a more commercial governance arrangement and operating model,
            be agreed.

1.3       That the Leader, subject to the Executive agreeing the above, will in
  consultation with the Executive Member for Finance and Performance, make
  any further decisions required (and make any appropriate delegations to
  officers) as to the terms of reference and operation of the Joint Committee
  and agreements between the Councils required to underpin these
  arrangements, be agreed.

1.4       That the Assistant Director (Governance and HR) be authorised to enter into
  the Joint Committee agreement (as approved by the Leader of the Council)
  and any additional legal documentation necessary for the establishment of
  the shared ICT and Digital Service be agreed.

1.5       That the total cost-of-change budget of a maximum of £5m to support the
  transition, of which Islington’s maximum contribution will be £2.5m, be
  agreed.

1.6       That the current thinking, that costs and savings for the core service offering
  will be shared on an equal basis between the two boroughs subject to due
  diligence and a further assessment of each borough’s level of contribution
  and anticipated financial benefit, be agreed.

 

Reason for decision – to achieve financial savings whilst improving service delivery and creating a rewarding work environment.

Other options considered – none, other than as detailed in the report and related papers.

Conflicts of interest / dispensations granted – none.