Agenda item

Proposed alterations to existing building comprising the construction of a new fifth floor extension for office floorspace at 9 - 11 Northburgh Street, new external cladding and facades facing Great Sutton Street and Northburgh Street, replacement of roof coverings and all windows with double glazed units, removal of two stair cores and replacement of passenger lifts; relocation of M&E central plant to the basement; comprehensive refurbishment of reception space, improvements to external courtyard and amenity spaces, and associated refuse and cycle storage.

(Planning Application Number: P2023/2609/FUL)

Nicholas Linford, planning officer, introduced the report. There had been minor alterations to the report. These changes include minor alterations to conditions, correction of typos, updating revision numbers, and clarification of certain conditions. The focus is on the approved works related to condition 6, specifically in relation to plant at roof level and flat roofs (condition 14). Change to the 2020 proposal include a slightly shorter height and improvements to facades and windows. There was focus on cladding removal, facade improvements, and the creation of a new front. There was removal of car parking, better access, reduced energy consumption, and upgraded building specifications making the façade better in keeping with the aesthetics of the area.

In response to questions from the Committee, the officer explained the wire metal mesh on Great Sutton Street was to be removed, aiming to re-expose the original form of the building. The cycle parking plan is noted to largely align with the local plan.

Regarding the Roof Height it was clarified on that the current application's roof extension is half a meter lower than the previous one in 2020. In response to a question, it was explained that the proposal is considered an infill between structures. The general principle was that it continues the previous structure without surpassing it, except for one area. This section represents an angled wedge that extends beyond the previously consented schemes.

The objector expressed concerns explaining they were not previously aware of the 2020 application. They lived in front of the building on Great Sutton Street and were apprehensive about the proposed construction. Their primary worries include the elevated roof and extension of a 5th-floor, which was not present when they purchased their building in 2011. This could cause potential adverse effects on the natural light entering their home. Additionally, the resident anticipated construction noise, considering the already existing works in the area, to cause noise pollution in the area. The main source of concern revolved around the alteration represented by the proposed roof extension and its potential impact on the resident's in the area with the increased use of the roof terrace and the construction noise created by the woks.

The applicant addressed concerns raised by the resident regarding the building envelope and potential height increase. They clarified that the proposed construction did not seek to enhance or increase the existing fifth-floor extension granted in the 2020 application, ensuring no change in the building's geometry in that regard. The applicant acknowledged concerns about construction noise and assured compliance with environmental management plans and acoustic performance requirements. The deteriorated state of the current extension was emphasised, indicating its unsuitability for occupation and the need for replacement with a structurally sound and aesthetically improved structure. The applicant highlighted the goal of achieving architectural continuity and aesthetic improvement, they also noted the potential decrease in antisocial behaviour with the building being in use, due to this being associated with unoccupied buildings. They finally noted demolition and construction would be limited as the original façade was being maintained.

The Councillors discussed the application, and the committee were supportive of taking the building back to its original structure and the reuse of the building.

Councillor Klute proposed to grant the application. Councillor Hayes seconded.

RESOLVED:

That following consideration of the case officer’s report (the assessment and recommendations therein), the presentation to Committee, submitted representations and objections provided verbally at this meeting, the planning permission be granted subject to the conditions and informatives set out in Appendix 1 (page 57-65 of the Agenda) of the officer report.